OPERATING7 SYSTEMS TRACKED1 OPERATOR
NOW · UPDATED THIS WEEKLEHI, UTINDEX BUILT 2026-08-11 21:17 MT

WorkA shared frame, in one sitting

AI-readiness assessment

The AI-readiness assessment scores an organization across seven competency domains using 28 questions, and returns four views of the same result rather than a single number. Questions filter by role, so an executive, a manager, an IT lead and an HR lead each answer what they can actually judge. Four views matter because one number hides which two domains are dragging the average down. Results export as a formatted PDF or as raw JSON.

ProductsOpen source

The problem

Most organizations answer "are we ready for AI" with a feeling. The people who ask are usually executives, and the answer they get back is a vendor's opinion. There is no shared frame, so two departments in the same company can disagree without ever finding out why.

What I built

An interactive assessment that scores an organization across seven competency domains, using 28 questions, and returns charts and a downloadable report. It filters questions by role, so an executive, a manager, an IT lead, and an HR lead each answer what they can judge.

How it works in plain words

The seven domains are: mindset and ethics, governance and risk, opportunity discovery, workflow integration and prompting, verification and quality, execution discipline, and culture and change.

You answer one domain at a time, with a progress bar showing where you are. Every domain has its own color, used consistently across every chart, so a weak area looks the same wherever it appears.

At the end you get four views of the same data: a bar chart by domain, a radar chart for the overall shape, a distribution, and a maturity matrix showing where you sit on the journey. Four views matter because a single number hides which two domains are dragging the average down.

Results export as a formatted PDF for sharing, or as raw JSON if you want to track scores over time rather than take a snapshot and forget it.

Honest status

The tool is live and working, and it has not been changed in about a year. Last commit 2025-08-15.

Pending from Jamesthe README calls the 28 questions "research-based". Name the sources, or the page will say "questions drawn from an internal rubric" instead. Do not publish "research-based" without citations.

Pending from Jameshas this been run by any real organization? If yes, how many, and can any of them be described anonymously by industry? If no, the page says so plainly.

Stack

Next.js 15 with the App Router. TypeScript. Tailwind CSS. shadcn/ui components. Framer Motion. Recharts. PDF export. Deployed on Vercel.

Stack

Next.js 15 App RouterTypeScriptTailwind CSSshadcn/uiFramer MotionRechartsVercel

Decision compiler

OfOne

An open-source decision compiler: a hard question becomes a typed, validated map, and the prose you read is a rendering of that map.

Spend telemetry

plimsoll

A local-first collector that joins AI coding spend to merged pull requests, so cost per shipped outcome stops being a guess.

Findability, measured

The visibility platform

A multi-tenant platform that measures how findable a business is in search and in AI answers, and prints the evidence under every score.

Grounded only in what’s published here — it says when it doesn’t know.